science of reading Archives

Bionic Reading: Y/N?

phonicsorg on December 23, 2024

Tech + nature – sounds like the future, right?

In recent years, a new reading method has captured attention across social media and educational technology platforms. Called “bionic reading,” this approach artificially bolds the first few letters of each word, claiming to create “fixation points” that help the brain process text more quickly. While its sleek marketing and promises of faster reading speeds have attracted many, the reality is far less promising than the hype suggests.

Does Science Support “Bionic Reading”?

The human brain’s approach to reading is remarkably sophisticated. Through decades of research, we’ve learned that proficient reading relies on a complex interplay of skills that develop systematically over time. Readers must first understand that letters represent sounds, then learn to decode words efficiently and achieve the automaticity that enables fluid comprehension. This process, while complex, is well-documented and understood.

Bionic reading fundamentally disrupts natural reading patterns. Artificially emphasizing certain parts of words creates visual patterns that don’t exist in real-world text. While this may seem helpful at first glance, it introduces an unnecessary layer of complexity to the reading process. Think of it like training wheels that create dependency rather than building true cycling skills. While they might provide an initial sense of security, they ultimately prevent the development of genuine balance and coordination.

The lack of scientific support for bionic reading is particularly concerning. Despite bold claims about improved reading speed and comprehension, no peer-reviewed research validates these assertions. In fact, the method contradicts what we know about how the brain processes text efficiently. Proficient readers don’t need artificial formatting cues; they develop natural eye movement patterns and word recognition through proper instruction and practice.

The Real Concerns for Reading Development

The implications of bionic reading are particularly troubling for developing readers. Children learning to read need consistent, predictable text presentations as they build their decoding skills. Introducing artificial formatting can interfere with this crucial developmental process. It’s like trying to learn a new language where some letters randomly appear in a different font – it adds an unnecessary layer of complexity to an already challenging task.

For students with reading difficulties, the situation becomes even more problematic. These learners often require systematic, explicit instruction in foundational reading skills. Bionic reading not only fails to provide this support but may create additional obstacles by training readers to rely on visual cues that won’t be present in real-world reading situations.

The Hidden Costs of Quick Fixes

The marketplace for bionic reading apps has exploded, with numerous platforms promising revolutionary results. The Bionic Reading® App leads the pack with an expensive subscription model and grand claims about reading improvement. Readsy combines bionic reading with rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), potentially creating eye strain and fatigue. Bionify and similar Chrome extensions apply this artificial formatting to all web content, potentially disrupting natural reading development across all online activities.

These applications share a common thread: they prioritize marketing appeal over scientific validity. They capitalize on our natural desire for quick solutions and technological advancement but fail to deliver on their fundamental promises. More concerningly, they may impede the development of genuine reading skills.

What Works: The Science of Reading

Instead of seeking shortcuts through artificial formatting, we should focus on what decades of research have proven effective. The science of reading tells us that strong reading skills develop through systematic, explicit instruction in foundational skills. This begins with phonemic awareness – understanding that words are made up of individual sounds – and progresses through systematic phonics instruction, where children learn how letters represent these sounds.

This systematic approach builds authentic reading skills across texts and contexts. Unlike bionic reading, which creates a dependency on special formatting, proper reading instruction develops natural fluency and comprehension skills that transfer to any reading situation.

Supporting Genuine Reading Development

Parents and educators concerned about reading development should focus on evidence-based practices that build lasting skills. This means:

Rather than downloading bionic reading apps, practice regular reading with real texts. This will help developing readers understand the sound-symbol relationships that form the foundation of reading. To build natural fluency, encourage repeated reading of appropriate-level texts.

For struggling readers, seek support from professionals trained in structured literacy approaches. Based on the science of reading, these methods provide systematic instruction that builds genuine reading skills rather than dependency on artificial cues.

Moving Forward

The emergence of trends like bionic reading reflects a broader challenge in education: the constant search for quick fixes to complex developmental processes. While the desire for faster, easier reading is understandable, strong reading skills develop through systematic instruction and regular practice.

Remember: in reading development, as in most aspects of education, if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is. Our children deserve approaches based on science, not marketing hype.

5 Findings That Prove Words Are Remembered in Phonological Memory

phonicsorg on June 27, 2024

To read fluently, the brain pulls from a large sight word vocabulary that we’ve built over time. Sight words make the reading process easy, automatic, and meaningful as we string together words we’re already familiar with. But how are sight words remembered? Furthermore, how does the brain store, process, and retrieve so many words from memory as we read?

The fascinating answer has much to do with phonological memory. There have been many discoveries that prove how sight words are stored and what this reveals about reading development. In this article, we look at some of the most interesting findings that prove how our word-reading memory functions—and why it’s not based on visual memorization.

How is Reading Fluency Developed?

Dr. David Kilpatrick, a renowned researcher in the science of reading, provides compelling evidence that sight words are not memorized as whole visual units as previously thought among educators. Instead, words are stored in our phonological memory, the part of the brain that processes speech sounds.

In his book Equipped for Reading Success, Dr. Kilpatrick explains the process of how words are remembered. In short, for children to become strong readers, they must develop three things.

Alphabetic Principle — The understanding that alphabetical letters (and letter combinations) represent individual sounds in spoken language.
Phonic Decoding Skills — The ability to apply knowledge of letter-sound relationships and effectively sound out (decode) unfamiliar words, letter by letter.
Orthographic Mapping — The process of repeatedly connecting spoken words to the spelling of their written words, resulting in permanent word memory over time. Orthographic mapping relies on two things:
1. Letter-Sound Proficiency
2. Phonemic Proficiency

As Dr. Kilpatrick explains, “Oral words are made up of sequences of oral sounds. Written words are strings of letters designed to represent those sounds. A word’s pronunciation (phonology) and meaning (semantics) are connected in memory with the word’s spelling (orthography), so when the printed word is seen, the pronunciation and meaning are instantly accessed. There is no guessing or sounding out the word. The word just effortlessly pops into your mind.” (Equipped for Reading Success, p. 38-39).

What is Phonological Memory?

Phonological memory refers to the part of our brain’s memory system that stores and retrieves speech sounds.

It plays an important role in reading development because to read words, a reader must know how to match visual letters with the sounds they represent. Then, they must decode multiple speech sounds—each pulled from phonological memory—and blend them together to reveal the whole word. Their knowledge of the whole word is also stored in phonological memory.

The letter sounds, pronunciation, syntax, and meaning of words all come from this phonological memory system, enabling beginner readers to sound out and comprehend words in print. Then, through orthographic mapping, this memory system stores the now-familiar words. Readers can easily recognize mapped words which then builds reading fluency. This is the “phonological filing system” as Dr. Kilpatrick calls it.

Proof That Words Are Remembered in Phonological Memory

In research on reading development, there’s plenty of evidence that word recognition is not based on visual memory alone. Rather, words are stored in phonological memory—the part of memory that relates to verbal language. In his book, Equipped for Reading Success, Kilpatrick illustrates examples of this evidence. Here is a summary of the key findings.

1. We Can Read Different Fonts and Typestyles

As literate individuals, we can read texts in various fonts and styles that we’ve never encountered before. This is one of the simplest facts that demonstrate word-reading memorization is not visual.

For example, we can read:

Mixed-case words (sPeLLiNg ThAt’s LiKe tHiS)
Different fonts (serif, sans-serif, bold, skinny, bubbly, squiggly, etc.)
Capital letters (ALL CAPS LIKE THIS) and lowercase letters (all lowercase like this) in various contexts
Different handwritings—from a doctor’s sloppy scribbles to a stranger’s unique print
Cursive and formal scripts

There’s no possible way a reader has been previously exposed to every style of text they will ever read. If words within an unfamiliar or hard-to-read piece of print have not been saved to visual memory, how can the reader decode them with ease? We know that most words are not stored in memory as whole visual units. No matter what font we read, our brains pull from phonological memory to decode new (and even barely legible) print styles.

2. We Know That Visual Memory Differs from Word Memory

The field of cognitive science has discovered that visual memory and word memory operate differently in the brain. The average literate adult can verbally identify words in print faster than they’re able to name visual objects in pictures. For example, if you compare the speed at which adults would say words for everyday objects (“house,” “phone,” “car,” etc.) based on reading the word aloud or identifying the object in a picture, the word recall speed is faster in reading.

Children with reading disorders have shown similar scores to proficient readers on visual memory tests, despite having significantly lower scores in word memory. If reading was dependent on visual memory for word recall, why would children score the same for visual tests but fail word-reading tests? This rules out a visual-based word memory.

Even more surprising is the finding that deaf individuals—despite achieving normal visual memory scores and having no visual impairments—typically struggle to obtain expected reading proficiency for their age. It’s estimated that one in three deaf students graduates high school with a reading level at or below third grade (Center on Literacy and Deafness). This hints at the importance of verbal (phonological) language in the development of word-reading memory.

3. We Correlate Sight Words With Phonemic Awareness

Sight words include any word that a reader is familiar with and can recognize by sight, with no need for decoding. There is a lot of correlation shown between phonemic awareness and sight words, whereas there is very little correlation between visual memory and sight words.

4. We Forget Words in Working Memory, Not Phonological Memory

Think about a time when you were trying to explain something in a conversation but you forgot the specific word to describe something. You know the meaning of the word and the point you’re trying to make, and yet you can’t remember the actual word for what you’re saying. You might stammer, “What’s the word…? It’s on the tip of my tongue!” but your mind goes blank.

This brief memory lapse does not happen when reading text that contains words we already know. For example, say you’re trying to remember the word “simmer” when verbally explaining the process of cooking something on the stovetop. You can’t remember the word that means not quite a boil but maintains cooking at a high temperature. Alternatively, if you were to read a recipe that stated, “Simmer on low for 20 minutes,” you’d have no problem recalling the word or what it means.

Why would we forget words in working memory but not in phonological memory? Word recall is not set in working memory. It has to do with phonology and the process of orthographic mapping.

5. We Have a Limited Capacity for Visual Memory

Although it’s been previously assumed that whole-word memorization is a required process for reading, our brains cannot store so many visualizations—at least not accurately. Research on visual memory has found that human memory is incapable of storing more than 30,000 to 60,000 words for retrieval.

When trying to remember a new address or phone number, what do you do? Most likely, you read the numbers and then repeat the string of digits either out loud or silently in your head. Quick, grab a piece of paper or your cell phone—write it down before you forget! If we could imprint text onto visual memory, this process would be much easier. We wouldn’t need to repeat the digits until we could offload them from our working memory.

Consider the fact that all of the above examples reveal that we use “visual input” to process text initially. However, we do not use visual storage to “memorize” the visuals we see. Instead, we rely on our knowledge of phonemic awareness, phonological memory, and sight words.

Understanding Phonological Memory: Help Children Learn to Read

Why does all of this matter? Knowing the role and function of phonological memory in reading development is crucial for effective literacy instruction. By understanding how words are decoded, remembered, processed, and retrieved, you can prioritize the necessary and effective phonics strategies when helping children learn to read. It’s highly advised you avoid whole-word memorization strategies–such as memorizing large lists of high-frequency words or “analyzing” the outer shape of a word–because these are common practices that are ineffective.

Learn more about evidence-based phonics instruction at Phonics.org where we explain reading science with practical applications for families and teachers.

How the Brain Learns to Read

phonicsorg on April 26, 2024

Reading is an advanced skill and a relatively new phenomenon among humans. While literacy is a crucial ability a child must develop to obtain knowledge and navigate society, it doesn’t come easily to many children. The process of how the brain learns to read is complex and often misunderstood.

To many people’s surprise, the ability to read is not primarily about visual processing. Rather, it’s a phonological (sound)-based process that requires the brain to make connections between speech and orthography (printed letters).

An understanding of reading and the brain impacts how educators teach phonics. Today, specific evidence-based strategies equip children to learn how to read more effectively. In this article, we explore some of the fascinating science behind reading acquisition and present several practical ways you can nurture strong readers.

The Science of Reading and How It Works in the Brain

Reading is not innate or hardwired in humans like spoken language is. While people can acquire spoken language naturally, they generally need explicit instruction in learning to read.

Why Phonics is Vital to Reading Development

Phonics plays a leading role in reading education. It teaches children the relationships between alphabetical letters and the sounds in language. This foundational skill allows children to decode unfamiliar words by blending individual sounds together.

Neuroscientists Mark Seidenberg and Stanislas Dehaene have made groundbreaking discoveries about how the brain learns to read. Seidenberg, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, extensively studied the neural mechanisms involved in reading acquisition. Dehaene, a professor at the Collège de France, conducted influential research using brain imaging techniques to understand the brain’s reading circuitry.

Through their work on the cognitive science of reading, they discovered the importance of how phonics is taught—particularly involving the brain’s phonological pathway.

The Phonological Pathway

According to Seidenberg and Dehaene’s research, a large portion of the brain’s ability to read is due to the phonological pathway. Seidenberg (2017) says that the importance of the phonological pathway in beginning reading, “is about as close to conclusive as research on human behavior can get.” This phonological pathway allows the brain to convert letters in print into verbal language by linking the visual symbols (letters) to their associated sounds. Then, the sounds of those letters can be blended into words.

Neuroimaging studies by Dehaene have revealed that a specific region in the brain’s left occipitotemporal cortex (the orthographic processor), dubbed the “visual word form area,” becomes specialized for this mapping process as children learn to read. This area connects visual inputs (alphabetical letters) to the brain’s language systems, enabling the conversion of written words into spoken language.

In contrast, the brain’s visual pathway relies on recognizing words as whole units or shapes. The visual pathway plays a secondary role in reading. While this pathway can be useful for quickly recognizing a limited number of familiar words, it’s inefficient for children learning to read new words. Early readers heavily rely on decoding to make sense of new or unfamiliar words, which requires first breaking them down into their sound components.

The phonological pathway is crucial for developing skilled reading abilities. Children who struggle to map letters to sounds and blend those sounds often experience significant reading difficulties.

Limitations of Visual Cues in Reading

Today, we know that the brain learns to read through the connection between the phonological pathway with the visual pathway. However, many traditional reading instructional methods have relied heavily on visual strategies, such as memorizing whole words or focusing on word patterns.

Since the science of reading has advanced in recent decades, experts now know that these visual approaches are limited. They can hinder the development of proficient reading skills.

One study by Seidenberg observed the effectiveness of different reading instruction methods. They found that children who received explicit, systematic phonics instruction outperformed those who were taught using a whole-word or visual-based approach. Explicit instruction noticeably improved kids’ ability to decode new words accurately—especially for children with specific learning disorders such as dyslexia.

Dehaene (2011) adds to this concept by explaining that the brain can identify words so quickly it creates the illusion of whole-word reading. However, “all the evidence to date suggests that visual words are being analyzed into their elementary components before the whole word can be put back together and recognized,” he stated. “This decomposition is so fast, parallel, and efficient as to seem almost instantaneous.”

Your Role in Children’s Reading Development

Whether you’re a teacher or a parent, you play a significant role in how your child’s brain learns to read. While the science behind reading development can be complex, having a basic understanding can support decisions for your child’s learning. Here are some practices to incorporate.

Explicit, Systematic Phonics

Providing systematic and explicit phonics instruction is important for teaching word-reading. This type of instruction prioritizes letter-sound relationships. It provides opportunities for children to practice blending sounds into words and segment words into individual sounds, rather than trying to memorize whole words visually.

Be Critical of Reading Programs

The idea that reading instruction should limit phonics and rely on visual memorization is still pervasive in education. Teachers and parents must take a critical look at reading programs to see if systematic phonics instruction is a dominant component. It should be suitable for beginner reading instruction.

Reading Aloud

Reading aloud to children and engaging in dialogic reading (where the child is actively involved in discussing the story) can foster language development and phonological awareness. Seidenberg (2017) says that the “most significant reading-related activity for young children is still being read to.” However, reading to children will not guarantee they will become readers. Systematic guidance is still necessary.

Playful Activities

Activities like rhyming games, identifying the initial sounds in words, and clapping out syllables can further enhance children’s sensitivity to the sound structure of language. Phonological awareness activities like this have been shown to help children develop stronger reading skills.

Start Early

Ideally, these strategies should be introduced early and consistently in a child’s life. High-quality phonics instruction is a key predictor of later reading success.

Help Kids Learn to Read: Phonics.org

Neuroscience proves the brain learns to read primarily through a phonological, sound-based process that maps written letters to their corresponding language sounds. This understanding underscores the importance of evidence-based, phonics-focused reading instruction that aligns with the brain’s process of literacy development.

By prioritizing systematic phonics instruction and activities that build phonological awareness, educators and parents can lay a strong foundation for their children to become confident readers.

Explore more resources at Phonics.org to learn about implementing these effective, science-backed strategies in your classroom or home!

Why Explicit Phonics Instruction is So Important

phonicsorg on March 6, 2024

Explicit phonics instruction is vital to literacy development, especially when it’s time for kids to begin reading. With the variety of phonics instruction methods and opinions in education today, it’s important to understand what works and why.

Let’s start by acknowledging the reality that children learn at different rates. Some students quickly adopt the skills they need to become readers; others require thorough instruction, effort, and repetition to grasp basic concepts and skills.

Explicit instruction has proven to help even the most struggling readers. Let’s look at why explicit instruction is so important for all learners!

The Most Effective Method of Phonics Instruction

According to the science of reading, effective phonics education must be two things: systematic and explicit.

Systematic

Whether a child grasps reading concepts earlier than the rest of their class or struggles with literacy development due to a specific learning disorder, systematic teaching serves a crucial purpose.

Systematic instruction works by guiding students through a step-by-step process. You begin with the simplest, most foundational concepts and build upon them sequentially up until the most complex.

In the same way you wouldn’t build a bridge without a carefully planned blueprint, thorough site preparation, and solid foundation, you can’t expect a child to read without first teaching them the core principles one after the next.

Explicit

Effective phonics instruction must be explicit. This means that teachers provide direct, structured, consistent teaching through modeling and examples, ensuring students comprehend the material before moving forward.

Also known as direct phonics instruction, explicit teaching follows a clear scope and sequence, meaning you have a framework of what to teach (scope) and when to teach it (sequence).

Explicit instruction is intentional, evidence-based, and practical. For example, an explicit, systematic phonics approach teaches similar letters together, focuses on short vowel sounds first, and introduces consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words.

Imagine throwing a child into the deep end of a pool. You would first need to help them prepare so they don’t drown! First, are they comfortable entering the water? Have you distinguished the shallow side versus the deep areas of the pool? Can they float? Have you taught them how to swim? The same analogy applies to reading and phonics. Explicit, supportive, and demonstrative instruction prepares kids with the knowledge and skills they must practice with a teacher until they can do it on their own.

Explicit, Systematic Phonics Instruction Meets Individual Learning Needs

Children who have difficulty with learning certain concepts may need an adapted approach. For early readers, adaptive teaching still uses the systematic, explicit method but may require:

A greater number of repetitions when learning a new skill (for example, some children learn a letter sound after only a few practices; others need hundreds of repetitions)
A different setting, such as learning in a group of readers at a similar level instead of learning surrounded by more advanced classmates
Further one-on-one teaching with a specialist in addition to classroom instruction

Assessing a Reader’s Strengths and Weaknesses

To teach phonics in a way that meets a child’s learning needs, you first need to know where they’re at in the developmental process. This not only identifies areas of weakness but also informs you of the child’s current capabilities and strengths.

Reading assessments provide information about a person’s reading skills and progress, as well as what instruction they need most. Assessments cover the core reading concepts including:

Letter knowledge
Phonemic awareness
Decoding
Fluency
Comprehension

The Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) is a common reading assessment in education today. It’s reliable, research-based, and free to access.

A quality phonics assessment typically includes a child’s ability to read “nonwords.” These are simple words that aren’t in the English language but can still be sounded out at appropriate reading levels; for example: ‘noz,’ ‘taf,’ and ‘voth.’ Nonwords allow educators and specialists to differentiate between words a child has memorized and what the child does when trying to read a new, unfamiliar word.

Once educators assess and understand a child’s reading abilities, they can facilitate progress through a direct phonics instruction approach.

Using the Response to Intervention Model in Reading Education

When students are at risk of failing to learn crucial literacy skills, parents or teachers often arrange a reading intervention. Sometimes schools use a Response to Intervention (RTI) model to determine the intensity and duration of a child’s reading intervention. This RTI model has three tiers:

Tier 1: A whole-class instruction that all students receive.
Tier 2: Some students who aren’t making progress from whole-class instruction may need additional small group instruction to catch up to their peers.
Tier 3: Children in need of the most intensive reading instruction require ongoing one-on-one support with specific interventions to help them improve their literacy skills.

In all instances of Response to Intervention, instructors and specialists use explicit, systematic teaching methods. By focusing on the most basic skills a child needs to learn and then building upon that structure, RTI programs can successfully help children learn to read.

Explicit Phonics Instruction: The Key to Lifelong Literacy

No matter a child’s current reading level, they deserve the literacy skills they need to become learners for life. These skills are set in stone thanks to direct phonics instruction.

At phonics.org, we provide teachers and parents with the resources they need to help kids become empowered, literate individuals. With nearly 67% of U.S. fourth graders currently reading below their grade level, explicit instruction must be adopted early to prevent this statistic from growing.

We’re here to make sure every child has the phonics essentials they need to succeed. To join the effort in raising strong readers and writers, reach out to us today.

Additional Resources:

Explicit Instruction (Dr. Anita Archer): A book that informs teachers about effective instruction for special needs learners.

DIBELS Tests for K-3: Standardized individual assessments for early literacy students.

At a Loss for Words (AMP Reports): A thorough exploration of effective vs. ineffective reading instruction, including examples of student outcomes and various observations from teachers.